It was The Mother of All Political Gambles.
Personally, I wouldn’t have done it. Too much risk of blowback.
If I were down by double digits, maybe I’d reconsider. But according to polling averages, Vivek Ramaswamy is only trailing by 3.4 points. And besides, Ohio tilts Republican anyway, which is probably why — even in polls where he’s losing — voters still think he’s going to win.
Nor would I have released it as an official campaign ad. Because it’s not the ad per se that’s wagging tongues, dropping jaws, and gnashing teeth — it’s the allegations within the ad.
Wow. I’ve never seen anything like this. Amy Acton’s mom in an ad warning people they should not vote for her Daugher. “She’s a liar…. She needs help.” Here comes the onslaught against Acton’s mother. Media are going to come all in supporting Acton. https://t.co/72mJrSrx05
— Jim Pfaff (@jimpfaff) October 20, 2026
I could’ve disseminated the exact same allegation by booking Donna Arthur (Amy Acton’s mom) on a media tour. Or arranging for her statement/warning to be uploaded to social media — and then amplifying it with my (many) surrogates ‘til it went viral. Or a million-zillion other ways.
Why cover it with my fingerprints?
There are plenty of ways to promote the message without directly owning it. For example, wouldn’t it be a helluva contrast if Vivek Ramaswamy hit the campaign trail with HIS mom — and she intro’d him to the crowd, boasting how she endorses him 100%?
Vivek’s mom is Geetha Ramaswamy. She’s still alive. (And, apparently, an impressive woman: a retired medical doctor with specialized training in geriatric psychiatry.) But according to a Google search, Gemini, and ChatGPT, there’s no record of her sharing the stage or appearing in ads with her gubernatorial candidate son. Ramaswamy’s wife has, but not his mom. Not even once.
I don’t get it, because it would have been the easiest, low-risk, most efficient way to draw attention to an opponent’s liability.
Hey, it’s an old (but effective) political tactic: If you’re a family man and your opponent is childless and unmarried, don’t directly attack her for it — instead, run thousands of ads featuring you, your beautiful wife, and your adorable kids. Make a point to talk about how much your family means to you, and how much you’ve learned from them.
The contrast will speak for itself.
Republican George Allen did it in 1993. His opponent, the unmarried and childless Mary Sue Terry, lost Virginia’s gubernatorial race in a landslide.
Republican George F. Allen said today that he would make a better governor than his opponent — “more understanding of the challenges facing the families of Virginia” — because he is married with children while Democrat Mary Sue Terry is single and childless.
[…]
“I’m proud of my family. It’s the most important part of my life, and I think it makes me more understanding of the challenges facing the families of Virginia, having to face those challenges along with them,” Allen said.
Allen’s television commercials and his campaign literature also have prominently featured photos of his family. He told Washington Post staff members in a recent interview that the emphasis on his family was not intended as a veiled attack on Terry.
Maybe Geetha Ramaswamy has stage fright, but c’mon — waiving to a crowd on a podium (or filming a testimonial in the privacy of her own home) is low-hanging fruit.
The risks for Ramaswamy from the ad are threefold:
- He explicitly mingled his brand with Donna Arthur’s. Doing so ties his campaign to her reputation, history, and credibility. If it turns out she’s a dishonest dirtbag, it’ll reflect VERY poorly on Ramaswamy. (National Review asserts there’s an “extensive record” that Amy Acton was an abused child.)
- The timing could be disastrous. If you’re gonna drop a major PR bomb like this, you ought do it four or five days before the election — not two full weeks out! That’s what the Democrats did in 2000, releasing George W. Bush’s DUI arrest on Nov. 2. Yes, early voting complicates today’s PR equation, but releasing this two weeks out gives the Democrats — and their foot soldiers in the media — an awful lot of time to dig into Donna Arthur’s background. It dramatically increases the likelihood of blowback.
- The controversy will almost certainly overshadow everything else between now and Election Day. The ad will suck all the oxygen out of the room; there won’t be enough bandwidth to talk about other issues that could, perhaps, move the needle for Ramaswamy. He’s put all his chips on the “mom” issue, and it’s unclear if that was his wisest bet.
But that doesn’t mean it won’t work. Hey, sometimes you’ve gotta go big — or go home.
According to external polls, it’s still a 3.4-point race. But maybe Ramaswamy’s internal polling paints a more desperate picture.
If so, a big, bold, paradigm-shifting move makes more sense.
And besides, maybe Ohio voters think so little of politicians, the idea that Amy Acton is a dirty, stinkin’ serial-liar who was just exposed by her own mother isn’t exactly farfetched. A PR campaign that capitalizes on confirmation bias could pay vast dividends.
If her own mother doesn’t trust her, why should we?
And maybe the numbers also make sense: Just 30% of Ohio 18-year-olds are registered to vote — compared to 78% of Ohioans 45 and older. And whereas just 27.6% of voters 18 to 24 and 44.3% of voters 25 to 44 will vote in midterms elections, 58.3% of voters 45 to 64, 68% of voters 65 to 74, and 65.2% of voters 75+ will cast ballots. So, without question, it’s an older demographic.
Perhaps older voters are more likely to sympathize with Acton’s elderly mother. Maybe many were abandoned or alienated by their children, too.
But it’s still high risk, because the media will try to turn it into an either-or question: Who’s more likely to be telling the truth, an abused child — or the mother who stayed loyal to the alleged abuser?
I don’t know who’s lying. Nor does anyone else in the media. But with Amy Acton and her brother both claiming that the abuse was real, the media has all the ammo it needs to portray Acton as the sympathetic, vulnerable, truthful victim — and Ramaswamy as the evil monster who’d exploit a child’s trauma.
(In the predictive markets, his odds have crashed to 22%. It’s a new low for his campaign.)
Republicans will be tempted to highlight the double standard: Over and over again, the Democrats have weaponized family members against GOP candidates. Mary Trump’s sole claim to fame is being the (estranged) niece of the president, yet the media has released thousands of news stories promoting her anti-Trump opinions. The Democrats ran ads featuring Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.)’s own siblings attacking him. In Nevada’s gubernatorial race, relatives of the Republican candidate blasted him as a phony. George Conway tried to leverage his fame as Kellyanne Conway’s ex-husband into an anti-Trump congressional career. (He failed.) And just a few months ago, the mainstream media ran oodles of news stories about Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt’s sister opposing his campaign. (She later endorsed him.)
The double standard is real. Republicans and Democrats are treated differently.
Media bias 100% exists.
But that still doesn’t mean this “mom” ad was a good idea. Because Ramaswamy isn’t running for office to expose media hypocrisy — his goal is winning the damn election.
Still, give him credit: He’s in it to win it. (Which is more than you can say about lots of Republicans.) He pushed all his chips to the center of the table, because second place isn’t acceptable.
It’s just not clear that this was his smartest bet.
Related: Asking Abdul El-Sayed About the Muslim Brotherhood Isn’t Islamophobic — It’s Patriotic!
One Last Thing: 2026 will reach a crescendo with the midterm elections. Nothing less than the future of our country teeters in the balance.
Never before have the political battle lines been so clearly defined. Blue wave or red wall, the 2026 midterms will transform our country.
We need your help to win the information war!
As a PJ Media VIP member, you’ll receive exclusive access to our behind-the-paywall content, commenting privileges, and an ad-free experience. VIP Gold gets you the same level of “insider access” across our entire family of sites (PJ Media, Townhall, RedState, twitchy, Hot Air, and Bearing Arms). That means: More stories, more videos, more content, more fun, more conservatism, more EVERYTHING!
And if you CLICK HERE and use the promo code FIGHT you’ll receive a Trumpian 60% discount!
Thank you for your consideration.
