It’s no secret that President Donald Trump and his administration are not exactly fans of the modern American media landscape.
(All the settlement money the president is collecting from networks like CNN is a tangible number you can apply to the administration’s collective disdain.)
Well, it turns out that that scathing disdain for the media applies across the pond, too.
According to Reuters, Trump has “threatened” to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation for the way it edited the president’s Jan. 6 speech.
Trump took umbrage with the way the network edited his 2021 speech, and has demanded a full retraction of it.
If the BBC doesn’t comply? Trump’s letter to the British network makes it clear that they’d be on the hook for “at least” $1 billion.
The issue at hand is that the BBC apparently spliced together different moments during Trump’s 2021 speech that made it seem like he was encouraging violence at the Capitol.
You can watch The Telegraph’s astute analysis of the issue at hand below:
🔴 EXCLUSIVE: The BBC is accused of editing a Trump speech to make him seem to back the Capitol riot.
A whistleblower memo says Panorama “completely misled” viewers by cutting key lines
Watch @gordonrayner’s full breakdown ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/A6nngI44Ll
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) November 3, 2025
Do you trust the mainstream media?
Trump’s lawyers blasted that portrayal as “false and defamatory.”
The lawyers also called out the BBC documentary for leaving out the part of Trump’s speech where he specifically told his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically.”
“The BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the Presidential Election,” a Trump representative told Reuters.
This is Samir Shah, Indian-born Chair of the BBC.
In 2021, he co-authored the UK government’s Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities report.
Can’t imagine why his staff would maliciously edit footage of Trump! 😂 pic.twitter.com/bEV7xWJRx7
— Peter Lloyd (@Suffragent_) November 10, 2025
As Reuters noted, the only real question left, should the BBC opt not to retract the documentary (it has been taken down, for what that’s worth), is in what jurisdiction the president would sue the British network.
The letter sent to the BBC by Trump’s lawyers specifically cited Florida (the president’s home state) statutes. But it’s well-known that the bar for public figures in U.S. defamation cases is incredibly high.
In England, one only needs to show how a publication has caused, or is likely to cause, reputational harm.
Regardless of what happens next in this defamation case, this entire ordeal has shaken BBC to its core.
As Politico noted, BBC’s director general and its most senior news executive both resigned on Sunday (just a day before Trump’s legal letter) after they had come under fire for the way they characterized and portrayed Trump’s 2021 remarks.
While a full retraction may not be in the works, at the very least, Trump has gotten an apology — sort of.
Reuters reported: “BBC Chair Samir Shah on Monday apologised for the editing of the footage, but he rejected claims of systemic bias in the broadcaster’s reporting.”
He added: “The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgment.”
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
